Finding the Relative Scarcities of 1949 Leaf Variations
I’m using data to estimate the relative print runs of the dozens of variations in the 1949 Leaf baseball checklist. It turns out some cards are up to 6 times harder to find than others.
I’m using data to estimate the relative print runs of the dozens of variations in the 1949 Leaf baseball checklist. It turns out some cards are up to 6 times harder to find than others.
I’m two years late in writing this. Brian Kappel’s writing brings readers up to speed on the ’49 Leaf baseball card set and pushes them to explore the next chapter of this set’s story.
They’re 1949, not 1948, but it doesn’t matter. You’re about to start worrying about your Ken Griffey, Jr. rookie.
This set included much more demographic data than previous baseball cards, including some real oddities like eye and hair color. Based solely on this information, which name in the checklist can claim the total of “most average ballplayer?”
Faye Throneberry and I grew up in entirely different worlds. I never knew high school could be optional.
Today marks my fifth anniversary of writing CardBoredom. I want to discuss a rather unique baseball card show, one where the tables exist solely to facilitate “show & tell” rather than buy & sell.
Another budget high number joins the 1952 Topps set building project. There is some blank space on the back for collectors to consider.
I would not have voted for Mike Garcia to be inducted into the Hall of Fame, but I absolutely would want him to at least be in the conversation when ballots are printed. Time for an argument.
Triumphs are reserved for royalty, and the last place you would look for a conqueror is in obscure corners of the minor leagues. Meet Prince Charlie.